VS
When evaluating costs, ZGI features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 1.5% for NNRG. Performance-wise, ZGI has returned 13.98% year-to-date with -$6 M in net flows, whereas NNRG is at 44.25% with +$47 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZGI
NNRG
| AuM | $491.08 M | $431.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 1.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 1.79% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.02% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZGI | -0.25% | +10.92% | +13.98% | +14.40% | +45.39% |
NNRG | +4.58% | +32.98% | +44.25% | +88.52% | +92.84% | |
| Flows | ZGI | -$0 M | -$6 M | -$6 M | -$149 M | -$274 M |
NNRG | +$18 M | +$41 M | +$47 M | -$10 M | -$220 M |
ZGI vs NNRG exposure
Countries
ZGI
USA
78.32%
Canada
21.58%
NNRG
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
ZGI
Energy
44.69%
Utilities
34.90%
Real Estate
10.32%
Other
9.98%
NNRG
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZGI
ENBRIDGE
9.23%
WILLIAMS
6.90%
US6362744095
6.48%
AMERICAN TOWER CL A REIT
6.21%
KINDER MORGAN
5.13%
TC ENERGY CORP
5.11%
CHENIERE ENERGY
4.93%
SEMPRA ENERGY
4.91%
ONEOK
4.55%
TARGA RESOURCS
4.15%
NNRG
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
ZGI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 49 total
57.60%
NNRG
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
ZGI
NNRG
| Provider | BMO | Ninepoint Partners |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Net Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.32% | 0.13% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 19, 2010 | May 14, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about ZGI and NNRG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZGI or NNRG?
As of April 30, 2026, ZGI has returned 13.98% year to date, while NNRG has returned 44.25%. NNRG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZGI or NNRG?
As of April 30, 2026, ZGI manages $491.08 M in assets, while NNRG manages $431.91 M. ZGI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZGI and NNRG managed?
ZGI is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. NNRG is actively managed by Ninepoint Partners. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZGI or NNRG?
Year to date, ZGI has seen -$5.93 M in net flows, compared with +$47.01 M for NNRG. NNRG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZGI and NNRG compare?
ZGI has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while NNRG has an expense ratio of 1.79%.
Recent articles about ZGI and NNRG
Middle East Tensions Push Canadian Energy ETFs Higher
Canadian energy ETFs climb as heat and hostilities collide. ETFs to watch.
Posted on 6/23/2025 by ETF Market Canada inCommodities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.