VS
Compare BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN) vs iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZIN provides Industrials, Energy, and Utilities exposures, while XEG is primarily weighted in Energy. When evaluating costs, ZIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for XEG. Performance-wise, ZIN has returned 21.32% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas XEG is at 30.33% with +$292 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZIN
XEG
| AuM | $55.64 M | $2,304.12 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 0.60% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.89% | 5.17% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZIN | +3.16% | +13.88% | +21.32% | +39.14% | +75.55% |
XEG | -13.41% | -2.88% | +30.33% | +40.71% | +91.43% | |
| Flows | ZIN | +$0 M | -$0 M | +$3 M | +$5 M | -$50 M |
XEG | +$206 M | +$249 M | +$292 M | +$230 M | -$626 M |
ZIN vs XEG exposure
Countries
ZIN
Canada
100.00%
XEG
Canada
99.95%
Sectors
ZIN
Industrials
63.50%
Other
15.82%
Energy
10.77%
Other
9.90%
XEG
Energy
99.50%
As of June 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZIN
CA1130061007
5.16%
BIRD CONSTRUCTION
3.94%
HAMMOND POWER SOLUTIONS
3.72%
NFI GROUP INC
3.27%
TFI INTERNATIONAL INC
3.24%
AECON GROUP
3.13%
ENERFLEX
3.10%
MULLEN GROUP
3.08%
CA8139211038
3.05%
SAVARIA
2.95%
XEG
SUNCOR ENERGY
26.41%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
22.68%
CENOVUS ENERGY
13.03%
IMPERIAL OIL
6.61%
TOURMALINE OIL
5.86%
WHITECAP RESOURCES
4.71%
ARC RESOURCES
4.46%
PRAIRIESKY ROYALTY
1.94%
TAMARACK VALLEY ENERGY
1.50%
ATHABASCA OIL
1.39%
Diversification
ZIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 36 total
34.63%
XEG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
88.60%
Characteristics
Compare
ZIN
XEG
| Provider | BMO | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD | S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.96% | 2.94% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 14, 2012 | March 19, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about ZIN and XEG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZIN or XEG?
As of June 17, 2026, ZIN has returned 21.32% year to date, while XEG has returned 30.33%. XEG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZIN or XEG?
As of June 17, 2026, ZIN manages $55.64 M in assets, while XEG manages $2.30 B. XEG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZIN and XEG managed?
ZIN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD benchmark. XEG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZIN and XEG emphasize?
ZIN is most exposed to Industrials, Energy, and Utilities. XEG is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZIN or XEG?
Year to date, ZIN has seen +$2.63 M in net flows, compared with +$291.76 M for XEG. XEG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZIN and XEG compare?
ZIN has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while XEG has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
What are the top holdings of ZIN and XEG?
ZIN's largest holdings include BIRD CONSTRUCTION and HAMMOND POWER SOLUTIONS. XEG's top holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY, CDN NATURAL RESOURCE, and CENOVUS ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZIN or XEG?
ZIN holds 32 securities, while XEG holds 26. On holdings count, ZIN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZIN and XEG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.