ZIN
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF

Full ZIN fund page
VS
XEG
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF

Full XEG fund page

Compare BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN) vs iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZIN provides Industrials, Energy, and Business Services exposures, while XEG is primarily weighted in Energy, Finance, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, ZIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for XEG. Performance-wise, ZIN has returned 20.03% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas XEG is at 52.81% with +$10 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-5.00.05.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZIN
-3.64%+0.64%+20.03%+27.47%+69.11%
XEG
+2.82%+15.44%+52.81%+59.55%+84.91%
Flows
ZIN
+$0 M+$3 M+$6 M+$3 M-$40 M
XEG
-$31 M-$151 M+$10 M+$215 M-$400 M

ZIN vs XEG exposure

Countries

ZIN
Canada
92.99%
USA
7.01%
XEG
Canada
99.97%

Sectors

ZIN
Industrials
74.31%
Energy
10.08%
Business Services
7.70%
Other
7.91%
XEG
Energy
95.44%
As of September 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZIN
Bird Construction, Inc.
4.92%
Brookfield Business Corp.
4.71%
Mullen Group Ltd.
3.93%
NFI Group, Inc.
3.67%
Air Canada
3.55%
Russel Metals, Inc.
3.42%
Bombardier, Inc.
3.22%
Hammond Power Solutions, Inc.
3.19%
Westshore Terminals Investment Corp.
3.06%
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
3.05%
XEG
Suncor Energy, Inc.
25.76%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
25.07%
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
13.38%
Imperial Oil Ltd.
6.32%
Tourmaline Oil Corp.
5.36%
Whitecap Resources, Inc.
4.66%
ARC Resources Ltd.
4.36%
PrairieSky Royalty Ltd.
1.89%
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd.
1.49%
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp.
1.22%

Diversification

ZIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 36 total
36.73%
XEG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 27 total
89.50%

Characteristics

Compare
ZIN
XEG
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CADS&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.90%2.41%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 14, 2012March 19, 2001

Frequently asked questions about ZIN and XEG

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZIN or XEG?
As of September 16, 2026, ZIN has returned 20.03% year to date, while XEG has returned 52.81%. XEG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZIN or XEG?
As of September 16, 2026, ZIN manages $57.94 M in assets, while XEG manages $2.39 B. XEG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZIN and XEG managed?
ZIN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD benchmark. XEG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZIN and XEG emphasize?
ZIN is most exposed to Industrials, Energy, and Business Services. XEG is most exposed to Energy, Finance, and Non-Energy Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZIN or XEG?
Year to date, ZIN has seen +$5.66 M in net flows, compared with +$10.48 M for XEG. XEG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZIN and XEG compare?
ZIN has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while XEG has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of ZIN and XEG?
ZIN's largest holdings include Bird Construction, Inc., Brookfield Business Corp., and Mullen Group Ltd.. XEG's top holdings include Suncor Energy, Inc., Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., and Cenovus Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZIN or XEG?
ZIN holds 36 securities, while XEG holds 27. On holdings count, ZIN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZIN and XEG

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds