VS
BMO US Equity Buffer Hedged to CAD ETF - January (ZJAN) and iShares Core Equity ETF (XEQT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZJAN focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services, while XEQT leans towards Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZJAN features a management fee (MER) of 0.73%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, ZJAN has returned 3% year-to-date with +$43 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 8.74% with +$4 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZJAN
XEQT
| AuM | $138.80 M | $17,136.45 M |
| Management Fees | 0.73% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.20% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZJAN | +4.09% | +2.40% | +3.00% | +13.76% | - |
XEQT | +6.42% | +5.38% | +8.74% | +32.69% | +78.18% | |
| Flows | ZJAN | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$43 M | +$51 M | - |
XEQT | +$746 M | +$2,383 M | +$3,731 M | +$7,101 M | +$11,831 M |
ZJAN vs XEQT exposure
Countries
ZJAN
USA
91.42%
Other
8.58%
XEQT
USA
41.95%
Canada
26.03%
Other
32.02%
Sectors
ZJAN
Information Technology
31.70%
Financials
9.88%
Communication Services
9.52%
Consumer Discretionary
9.37%
Health Care
8.86%
Other
8.18%
Other
22.48%
XEQT
Information Technology
19.08%
Financials
18.45%
Industrials
10.70%
Energy
7.76%
Consumer Discretionary
7.73%
Other
7.44%
Other
28.84%
As of May 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZJAN
NVIDIA
6.97%
APPLE
6.29%
MICROSOFT-T
4.62%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.41%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.76%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.42%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.22%
META PLATFORMS
2.04%
TESLA
1.74%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.51%
XEQT
NVIDIA
2.89%
APPLE
2.54%
MICROSOFT-T
1.88%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.76%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.39%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.22%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.14%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.13%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.00%
ENBRIDGE
0.92%
Diversification
ZJAN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
33.97%
XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,328 total
15.88%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZJAN and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZJAN or XEQT?
As of May 6, 2026, ZJAN has returned 3.00% year to date, while XEQT has returned 8.74%. XEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZJAN or XEQT?
As of May 6, 2026, ZJAN manages $138.80 M in assets, while XEQT manages $17.14 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZJAN and XEQT managed?
ZJAN is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZJAN and XEQT emphasize?
ZJAN is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Communication Services. XEQT is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZJAN or XEQT?
Year to date, ZJAN has seen +$42.52 M in net flows, compared with +$3,730.89 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZJAN and XEQT compare?
ZJAN has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.20%.
What are the top holdings of ZJAN and XEQT?
ZJAN's largest holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL. XEQT's top holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZJAN or XEQT?
ZJAN holds 477 securities, while XEQT holds 7453. On holdings count, XEQT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZJAN and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.