ZLB
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF

Full ZLB fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

Compare BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB) vs iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZLB provides Financials, Utilities, and Consumer Staples exposures, while XIC is primarily weighted in Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, ZLB features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, ZLB has returned 6.26% year-to-date with +$149 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 11.19% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZLB
+4.57%+3.21%+6.26%+18.76%+59.69%
XIC
+2.09%+6.97%+11.19%+34.35%+90.68%
Flows
ZLB
-$55 M+$60 M+$149 M+$459 M+$1,275 M
XIC
+$420 M+$2,784 M+$5,677 M+$7,745 M+$11,716 M

ZLB vs XIC exposure

Countries

ZLB
Canada
98.78%
XIC
Canada
99.06%

Sectors

ZLB
Financials
24.88%
Utilities
17.47%
Consumer Staples
16.32%
Communication Services
9.26%
Other
8.35%
Other
23.71%
XIC
Financials
29.96%
Energy
17.73%
Materials
14.57%
Other
13.30%
Other
24.44%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZLB
LOBLAW COMPANIES
4.66%
HYDRO ONE
4.13%
FORTIS
4.10%
QUEBECOR SUB VOTING
3.99%
GREAT WEST LIFECO
3.73%
EMERA
3.54%
METRO
3.52%
EMPIRE
3.43%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
3.04%
TMX GROUP LTD
3.04%
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.02%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.05%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.38%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.00%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.89%
CA11271J1075
2.78%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.78%
BNS
2.68%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.63%

Diversification

ZLB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 51 total
37.17%
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
36.37%

Characteristics

Compare
ZLB
XIC
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.83%2.01%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 27, 2011February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about ZLB and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZLB or XIC?
As of June 12, 2026, ZLB has returned 6.26% year to date, while XIC has returned 11.19%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZLB or XIC?
As of June 12, 2026, ZLB manages $6.16 B in assets, while XIC manages $30.26 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZLB and XIC managed?
ZLB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZLB and XIC emphasize?
ZLB is most exposed to Financials, Utilities, and Consumer Staples. XIC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZLB or XIC?
Year to date, ZLB has seen +$149.35 M in net flows, compared with +$5,676.75 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZLB and XIC compare?
ZLB has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What are the top holdings of ZLB and XIC?
ZLB's largest holdings include LOBLAW COMPANIES and HYDRO ONE. XIC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZLB or XIC?
ZLB holds 47 securities, while XIC holds 193. On holdings count, XIC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZLB and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds