VS
When evaluating costs, ZMMK features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.14% for CSAV. Performance-wise, ZMMK has returned 1.98% year-to-date with +$625 M in net flows, whereas CSAV is at 1.74% with -$933 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZMMK
CSAV
| AuM | $6,300.21 M | $4,367.54 M |
| Management Fees | 0.28% | 0.14% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.13% | 0.15% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZMMK | +0.20% | +0.59% | +1.98% | +2.36% | +10.85% |
CSAV | +0.18% | +0.51% | +1.74% | +2.08% | +9.83% | |
| Flows | ZMMK | +$301 M | +$500 M | +$625 M | +$1,230 M | +$5,130 M |
CSAV | -$45 M | -$145 M | -$933 M | -$1,071 M | -$4,417 M |
ZMMK vs CSAV exposure
Countries
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZMMK and CSAV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZMMK or CSAV?
As of November 2, 2026, ZMMK has returned 1.98% year to date, while CSAV has returned 1.74%. ZMMK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZMMK or CSAV?
As of November 2, 2026, ZMMK manages $6.30 B in assets, while CSAV manages $4.37 B. ZMMK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZMMK and CSAV managed?
ZMMK is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. CSAV is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZMMK or CSAV?
Year to date, ZMMK has seen +$625.01 M in net flows, compared with -$933.06 M for CSAV. ZMMK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZMMK and CSAV compare?
ZMMK has an expense ratio of 0.13%, while CSAV has an expense ratio of 0.15%.
Recent articles about ZMMK and CSAV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.