When evaluating costs, ZMMK features a management fee (MER) of 0.28%, compared to 0.2% for MNY. Performance-wise, ZMMK has returned 1.98% year-to-date with +$625 M in net flows, whereas MNY is at 2.02% with +$228 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZMMK
MNY
| AuM | $6,300.21 M | $1,833.26 M |
| Management Fees | 0.28% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.13% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZMMK | +0.20% | +0.59% | +1.98% | +2.36% | +10.85% |
MNY | +0.20% | +0.58% | +2.02% | +2.44% | +11.02% | |
| Flows | ZMMK | +$301 M | +$500 M | +$625 M | +$1,230 M | +$5,130 M |
MNY | -$10 M | -$58 M | +$228 M | +$293 M | +$1,429 M |
ZMMK vs MNY exposure
Countries
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
MNY
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
MNY
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
MNY
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
MNY
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
ZMMK
MNY
| Provider | BMO | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.37% | 2.42% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 1, 2021 | September 14, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about ZMMK and MNY
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZMMK or MNY?
As of November 2, 2026, ZMMK has returned 1.98% year to date, while MNY has returned 2.02%. MNY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZMMK or MNY?
As of November 2, 2026, ZMMK manages $6.30 B in assets, while MNY manages $1.83 B. ZMMK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZMMK and MNY managed?
ZMMK is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. MNY is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZMMK or MNY?
Year to date, ZMMK has seen +$625.01 M in net flows, compared with +$228.03 M for MNY. ZMMK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZMMK and MNY compare?
ZMMK has an expense ratio of 0.13%, while MNY has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
Recent articles about ZMMK and MNY
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.