Compare BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP) vs Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZSP and VFV provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, ZSP features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.08% for VFV. Performance-wise, ZSP has returned 12.96% year-to-date with +$389 M in net flows, whereas VFV is at 12.97% with +$3 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZSP
VFV
| AuM | $24,135.90 M | $34,297.80 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.10% | 0.18% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 22, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZSP | +0.98% | +8.47% | +12.96% | +24.21% | +81.72% |
VFV | -0.16% | +8.48% | +12.97% | +24.23% | +82.74% | |
| Flows | ZSP | +$2 M | +$58 M | +$389 M | +$979 M | +$5,261 M |
VFV | +$592 M | +$1,738 M | +$3,063 M | +$4,629 M | +$14,419 M |
ZSP vs VFV exposure
Countries
ZSP
USA
97.59%
VFV
USA
96.91%
Sectors
ZSP
Technology
45.24%
Finance
13.35%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.96%
Healthcare
8.87%
Industrials
7.90%
Other
15.69%
VFV
Technology
45.60%
Finance
12.94%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Healthcare
8.64%
Industrials
7.92%
Other
16.18%
As of July 22, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.48%
Microsoft Corp.
4.29%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.68%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.60%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.94%
Tesla, Inc.
1.81%
VFV
NVIDIA Corp.
7.48%
Apple, Inc.
6.56%
Microsoft Corp.
4.28%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.23%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.58%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.01%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%
Tesla, Inc.
1.83%
Diversification
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.20%
VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
36.23%
Characteristics
Compare
ZSP
VFV
| Provider | BMO | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD | S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.77% | 0.84% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 14, 2012 | November 2, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about ZSP and VFV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZSP or VFV?
As of July 22, 2026, ZSP has returned 12.96% year to date, while VFV has returned 12.97%. VFV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZSP or VFV?
As of July 22, 2026, ZSP manages $24.14 B in assets, while VFV manages $34.30 B. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZSP and VFV managed?
ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZSP and VFV emphasize?
ZSP is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. VFV is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZSP or VFV?
Year to date, ZSP has seen +$389.00 M in net flows, compared with +$3,062.52 M for VFV. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZSP and VFV compare?
ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of ZSP and VFV?
ZSP's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. VFV's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZSP or VFV?
ZSP holds 495 securities, while VFV holds 496. On holdings count, VFV is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZSP and VFV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.