ZUB
BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF

Full ZUB fund page
VS
HMAX
Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF

Full HMAX fund page

BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF (ZUB) and Hamilton Canadian Financials Yield Maximizer ETF (HMAX) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZUB focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, while HMAX leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, ZUB features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.65% for HMAX. Performance-wise, ZUB has returned 1.93% year-to-date with -$26 M in net flows, whereas HMAX is at 6.15% with +$197 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-20246810%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZUB
+7.45%+0.45%+1.93%+36.04%+94.71%
HMAX
+8.49%+5.76%+6.15%+38.66%+69.64%
Flows
ZUB
-$58 M+$17 M-$26 M-$237 M-$341 M
HMAX
+$3 M+$143 M+$197 M+$658 M+$1,694 M

ZUB vs HMAX exposure

Countries

ZUB
USA
100.00%
HMAX
Canada
101.40%

Sectors

ZUB
Financials
90.18%
Other
9.82%
HMAX
Financials
90.60%
Other
9.40%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZUB
CITIGROUP
5.21%
WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
5.13%
CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP
5.12%
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP
5.07%
JPMORGAN CHASE
5.07%
PNC FINL SVC
5.06%
KEYCORP
5.05%
EAST WEST BANCORP
5.05%
US
5.03%
FIRST CITIZENS BANCSHARES
5.02%
HMAX
ROYAL BK CANADA
24.50%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.00%
CA11271J1075
10.80%
BANK OF MONTREAL
10.40%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
9.50%
BNS
9.30%
MANULIFE-S
6.30%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
5.50%
GREAT WEST LIFECO
4.60%
INTACT FINANCIAL
3.50%

Diversification

ZUB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
50.81%
HMAX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
101.40%

Characteristics

Compare
ZUB
HMAX
ProviderBMOHamilton ETFs
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight US Bank Canadian Dollar Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD-
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.93%11.88%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 19, 2010January 20, 2023

Frequently asked questions about ZUB and HMAX

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZUB or HMAX?
As of April 24, 2026, ZUB has returned 1.93% year to date, while HMAX has returned 6.15%. HMAX is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZUB or HMAX?
As of April 24, 2026, ZUB manages $355.92 M in assets, while HMAX manages $2.20 B. HMAX is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZUB and HMAX managed?
ZUB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight US Bank Canadian Dollar Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZUB and HMAX emphasize?
ZUB is most exposed to Financials. HMAX is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZUB or HMAX?
Year to date, ZUB has seen -$26.07 M in net flows, compared with +$197.26 M for HMAX. HMAX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZUB and HMAX compare?
ZUB has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while HMAX has an expense ratio of 0.80%.
What are the top holdings of ZUB and HMAX?
ZUB's largest holdings include CITIGROUP and WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION. HMAX's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZUB or HMAX?
ZUB holds 19 securities, while HMAX holds 10. On holdings count, ZUB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZUB and HMAX

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds