ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Compare BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) vs BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZUT provides Utilities exposures, while ZEB is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, ZUT features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, ZUT has returned 20.18% year-to-date with -$66 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 25.29% with -$1,134 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.08.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZUT
+3.71%+8.83%+20.18%+27.67%+47.40%
ZEB
+8.46%+23.65%+25.29%+67.84%+147.83%
Flows
ZUT
-$4 M+$15 M-$66 M+$132 M+$243 M
ZEB
-$103 M-$237 M-$1,134 M-$935 M-$1,914 M

ZUT vs ZEB exposure

Countries

ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%

Diversification

ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
ZUT
ZEB
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.77%2.41%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 19, 2010October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about ZUT and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZUT or ZEB?
As of June 12, 2026, ZUT has returned 20.18% year to date, while ZEB has returned 25.29%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZUT or ZEB?
As of June 12, 2026, ZUT manages $901.76 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.58 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZUT and ZEB managed?
ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZUT and ZEB emphasize?
ZUT is most exposed to Utilities. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZUT or ZEB?
Year to date, ZUT has seen -$65.77 M in net flows, compared with -$1,133.77 M for ZEB. ZUT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZUT and ZEB compare?
ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of ZUT and ZEB?
ZUT's largest holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and ALTAGAS. ZEB's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZUT or ZEB?
ZUT holds 13 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, ZUT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZUT and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds