VS
When evaluating costs, ZWC features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for ZWB. Performance-wise, ZWC has returned 16.6% year-to-date with +$348 M in net flows, whereas ZWB is at 28.87% with -$20 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZWC
ZWB
| AuM | $2,521.06 M | $4,656.29 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZWC | +2.67% | +0.76% | +16.60% | +22.69% | +77.60% |
ZWB | +1.83% | -1.05% | +28.87% | +39.65% | +140.84% | |
| Flows | ZWC | +$13 M | +$70 M | +$348 M | +$380 M | +$300 M |
ZWB | -$52 M | -$73 M | -$20 M | -$16 M | -$347 M |
ZWC vs ZWB exposure
Countries
ZWC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
ZWC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZWC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
ZWC
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZWC and ZWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZWC or ZWB?
As of October 28, 2026, ZWC has returned 16.60% year to date, while ZWB has returned 28.87%. ZWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWC or ZWB?
As of October 28, 2026, ZWC manages $2.52 B in assets, while ZWB manages $4.66 B. ZWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWC and ZWB managed?
ZWC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZWB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZWC or ZWB?
Year to date, ZWC has seen +$347.74 M in net flows, compared with -$19.84 M for ZWB. ZWC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZWC and ZWB compare?
ZWC has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while ZWB has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
Recent articles about ZWC and ZWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.