VS
Compare BMO US High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWH) vs BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZWH provides Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while ZWB is primarily weighted in Finance. When evaluating costs, ZWH features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for ZWB. Performance-wise, ZWH has returned 12.88% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZWB is at 25.5% with +$37 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZWH
ZWB
| AuM | $1,150.82 M | $4,616.11 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZWH | +0.01% | +0.21% | +12.88% | +17.20% | +44.28% |
ZWB | -4.71% | +2.82% | +25.50% | +42.42% | +112.22% | |
| Flows | ZWH | +$11 M | +$25 M | +$0 M | -$15 M | -$94 M |
ZWB | -$17 M | +$21 M | +$37 M | +$37 M | -$243 M |
ZWH vs ZWB exposure
Countries
ZWH
USA
98.33%
ZWB
Canada
100.03%
Sectors
ZWH
Technology
31.11%
Finance
17.44%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.70%
Healthcare
9.64%
Energy
8.52%
Other
22.58%
ZWB
Finance
100.03%
As of September 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZWH
AbbVie, Inc.
5.32%
Apple, Inc.
5.27%
Merck & Co., Inc.
4.32%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
4.29%
Bank of America Corp.
4.14%
Broadcom Inc.
4.13%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.12%
Chevron Corp.
3.73%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
3.26%
CVS Health Corp.
3.02%
ZWB
Bank of Montreal
17.17%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.06%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.82%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.57%
National Bank of Canada
16.29%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.13%
Diversification
ZWH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
41.61%
ZWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.03%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about ZWH and ZWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZWH or ZWB?
As of September 15, 2026, ZWH has returned 12.88% year to date, while ZWB has returned 25.50%. ZWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWH or ZWB?
As of September 15, 2026, ZWH manages $1.15 B in assets, while ZWB manages $4.62 B. ZWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWH and ZWB managed?
ZWH is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZWB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZWH and ZWB emphasize?
ZWH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ZWB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZWH or ZWB?
Year to date, ZWH has seen +$0.36 M in net flows, compared with +$36.57 M for ZWB. ZWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZWH and ZWB compare?
ZWH has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while ZWB has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of ZWH and ZWB?
ZWH's largest holdings include AbbVie, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Merck & Co., Inc.. ZWB's top holdings include Bank of Montreal, Royal Bank of Canada, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZWH or ZWB?
ZWH holds 40 securities, while ZWB holds 6. On holdings count, ZWH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZWH and ZWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.