VS
When evaluating costs, ZWS features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.6% for BANK. Performance-wise, ZWS has returned 12.1% year-to-date with -$8 M in net flows, whereas BANK is at 34.78% with +$309 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZWS
BANK
| AuM | $128.18 M | $1,339.25 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.83% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZWS | +3.51% | +3.67% | +12.10% | +13.45% | +46.51% |
BANK | +3.81% | +3.65% | +34.78% | +48.18% | +134.07% | |
| Flows | ZWS | +$7 M | +$7 M | -$8 M | -$15 M | -$73 M |
BANK | +$12 M | +$67 M | +$309 M | +$387 M | +$912 M |
ZWS vs BANK exposure
Countries
ZWS
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
ZWS
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZWS
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
ZWS
Exposure data will be available soon
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
ZWS
BANK
| Provider | BMO | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 6.59% | 12.26% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 7, 2018 | February 1, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about ZWS and BANK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZWS or BANK?
As of October 29, 2026, ZWS has returned 12.10% year to date, while BANK has returned 34.78%. BANK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWS or BANK?
As of October 29, 2026, ZWS manages $128.18 M in assets, while BANK manages $1.34 B. BANK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWS and BANK managed?
ZWS is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. BANK is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZWS or BANK?
Year to date, ZWS has seen -$8.44 M in net flows, compared with +$309.17 M for BANK. BANK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZWS and BANK compare?
ZWS has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while BANK has an expense ratio of 0.83%.
Recent articles about ZWS and BANK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.