ZXLI
BMO SPDR Industrials Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLI fund page
VS
ZIN
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF

Full ZIN fund page

BMO SPDR Industrials Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLI) and BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials, while ZIN leans towards Industrials, Energy, and Business Services. When evaluating costs, ZXLI features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.55% for ZIN. Performance-wise, ZXLI has returned 12.04% year-to-date with +$17 M in net flows, whereas ZIN is at 19.86% with +$6 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.0%Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9Sep 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 18, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZXLI
-6.91%-6.92%+12.04%+13.89%-
ZIN
-2.36%-1.21%+19.86%+26.59%+68.88%
Flows
ZXLI
+$2 M+$2 M+$17 M+$18 M-
ZIN
+$0 M+$3 M+$6 M+$3 M-$40 M

ZXLI vs ZIN exposure

Countries

ZXLI
USA
92.91%
Other
7.09%
ZIN
Canada
92.99%
USA
7.01%

Sectors

ZXLI
Industrials
89.11%
Other
10.89%
ZIN
Industrials
74.31%
Energy
10.08%
Business Services
7.70%
Other
7.91%
As of September 18, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZXLI
GE Aerospace
6.71%
Caterpillar, Inc.
6.70%
RTX Corp.
5.17%
GE Vernova, Inc.
4.75%
Union Pacific Corp.
3.10%
The Boeing Co.
3.04%
Eaton Corp. Plc
2.88%
Deere & Co.
2.66%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
2.56%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
2.20%
ZIN
Bird Construction, Inc.
4.92%
Brookfield Business Corp.
4.71%
Mullen Group Ltd.
3.93%
NFI Group, Inc.
3.67%
Air Canada
3.55%
Russel Metals, Inc.
3.42%
Bombardier, Inc.
3.22%
Hammond Power Solutions, Inc.
3.19%
Westshore Terminals Investment Corp.
3.06%
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
3.05%

Diversification

ZXLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 81 total
39.75%
ZIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 36 total
36.73%

Characteristics

Compare
ZXLI
ZIN
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.86%0.91%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 2, 2025November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about ZXLI and ZIN

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLI or ZIN?
As of September 18, 2026, ZXLI has returned 12.04% year to date, while ZIN has returned 19.86%. ZIN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLI or ZIN?
As of September 18, 2026, ZXLI manages $24.86 M in assets, while ZIN manages $57.86 M. ZIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLI and ZIN managed?
ZXLI is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZIN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZXLI and ZIN emphasize?
ZXLI is most exposed to Industrials, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials. ZIN is most exposed to Industrials, Energy, and Business Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLI or ZIN?
Year to date, ZXLI has seen +$17.24 M in net flows, compared with +$5.66 M for ZIN. ZXLI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLI and ZIN compare?
ZXLI has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while ZIN has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLI and ZIN?
ZXLI's largest holdings include GE Aerospace, Caterpillar, Inc., and RTX Corp.. ZIN's top holdings include Bird Construction, Inc., Brookfield Business Corp., and Mullen Group Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLI or ZIN?
ZXLI holds 81 securities, while ZIN holds 36. On holdings count, ZXLI is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZXLI and ZIN

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds