VS
BMO SPDR Industrials Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLI) and BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials, while ZIN leans towards Industrials, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, ZXLI features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.55% for ZIN. Performance-wise, ZXLI has returned 8.64% year-to-date with +$17 M in net flows, whereas ZIN is at 20.33% with +$9 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZXLI
ZIN
| AuM | $24.11 M | $60.93 M |
| Management Fees | 0.21% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.76% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZXLI | -5.77% | -11.07% | +8.64% | +7.68% | - |
ZIN | -3.23% | -2.39% | +20.33% | +24.77% | +79.74% | |
| Flows | ZXLI | -$0 M | +$2 M | +$17 M | +$18 M | - |
ZIN | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$9 M | +$9 M | -$7 M |
ZXLI vs ZIN exposure
Countries
ZXLI
USA
92.41%
Other
7.59%
ZIN
Canada
94.60%
Sectors
ZXLI
Industrials
89.32%
Other
10.68%
ZIN
Industrials
75.14%
Energy
11.07%
Other
13.79%
As of November 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZXLI
US81369Y7040
100.00%
ZIN
Hammond Power Solutions, Inc.
3.34%
Finning International, Inc.
3.33%
Aecon Group, Inc.
3.27%
Bird Construction, Inc.
3.23%
Toromont Industries Ltd.
3.22%
Russel Metals, Inc.
3.22%
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
3.16%
Cargojet, Inc.
3.11%
Westshore Terminals Investment Corp.
3.05%
Mullen Group Ltd.
2.98%
Diversification
ZXLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 82 total
100.00%
ZIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
31.92%
Characteristics
Compare
ZXLI
ZIN
| Provider | BMO | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.92% | 0.83% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 2, 2025 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about ZXLI and ZIN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLI or ZIN?
As of November 6, 2026, ZXLI has returned 8.64% year to date, while ZIN has returned 20.33%. ZIN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLI or ZIN?
As of November 6, 2026, ZXLI manages $24.11 M in assets, while ZIN manages $60.93 M. ZIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLI and ZIN managed?
ZXLI is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZIN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLI or ZIN?
ZXLI holds 1 securities, while ZIN holds 35. On holdings count, ZIN is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLI or ZIN?
Year to date, ZXLI has seen +$17.22 M in net flows, compared with +$8.71 M for ZIN. ZXLI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLI and ZIN compare?
ZXLI has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while ZIN has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What sectors do ZXLI and ZIN emphasize?
ZXLI is most exposed to Industrials, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials. ZIN is most exposed to Industrials, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials.
Recent articles about ZXLI and ZIN
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.