VS
When evaluating costs, BANK features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.65% for ZWB. Performance-wise, BANK has returned 32.28% year-to-date with +$236 M in net flows, whereas ZWB is at 28.23% with +$53 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BANK
ZWB
| AuM | $1,290.20 M | $4,786.16 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.83% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BANK | +4.24% | +20.46% | +32.28% | +64.54% | +95.24% |
ZWB | +1.91% | +15.99% | +28.23% | +56.28% | +109.47% | |
| Flows | BANK | +$75 M | +$157 M | +$236 M | +$424 M | +$860 M |
ZWB | +$47 M | +$43 M | +$53 M | +$40 M | -$206 M |
BANK vs ZWB exposure
Countries
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Canada
100.22%
Sectors
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Finance
100.22%
As of July 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Bank of Montreal
17.32%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.30%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.03%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.71%
National Bank of Canada
15.99%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.86%
Diversification
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.22%
Characteristics
Compare
BANK
ZWB
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 10.95% | 4.70% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2022 | January 28, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about BANK and ZWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BANK or ZWB?
As of July 24, 2026, BANK has returned 32.28% year to date, while ZWB has returned 28.23%. BANK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BANK or ZWB?
As of July 24, 2026, BANK manages $1.29 B in assets, while ZWB manages $4.79 B. ZWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BANK and ZWB managed?
BANK is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. ZWB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BANK or ZWB?
Year to date, BANK has seen +$235.67 M in net flows, compared with +$53.30 M for ZWB. BANK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BANK and ZWB compare?
BANK has an expense ratio of 0.83%, while ZWB has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
Recent articles about BANK and ZWB
How Canadians Can Generate Income with these Covered Call ETFs
A look at Canadian Covered Call ETFs that have attractive distribution yields.
Posted on 10/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
Unleashing the Potential of Covered Call ETFs
Here's all you need to know about covered call ETFs as a Canadian investor.
Posted on 6/7/2023 by Tony Dong inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.