VS
When evaluating costs, CALL features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.65% for ZWB. Performance-wise, CALL has returned 4.93% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZWB is at 28.28% with -$20 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CALL
ZWB
| AuM | $116.56 M | $4,635.28 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CALL | +1.73% | -5.29% | +4.93% | +15.15% | +73.32% |
ZWB | +1.37% | -0.38% | +28.28% | +39.51% | +143.34% | |
| Flows | CALL | +$1 M | -$6 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | +$19 M |
ZWB | -$52 M | -$73 M | -$20 M | -$16 M | -$347 M |
CALL vs ZWB exposure
Countries
CALL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CALL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CALL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CALL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZWB
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CALL
ZWB
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 10.11% | 5.36% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 16, 2017 | January 28, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about CALL and ZWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CALL or ZWB?
As of October 27, 2026, CALL has returned 4.93% year to date, while ZWB has returned 28.28%. ZWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CALL or ZWB?
As of October 27, 2026, CALL manages $116.56 M in assets, while ZWB manages $4.64 B. ZWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CALL and ZWB managed?
CALL is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. ZWB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CALL or ZWB?
Year to date, CALL has seen +$1.80 M in net flows, compared with -$19.84 M for ZWB. CALL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CALL and ZWB compare?
CALL has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZWB has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
Recent articles about CALL and ZWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.