CALL
Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF

Full CALL fund page
VS
ZWB
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF

Full ZWB fund page

Compare Evolve US Banks Enhanced Yield ETF (CALL) vs BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CALL provides Financials and Materials exposures, while ZWB is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, CALL features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.65% for ZWB. Performance-wise, CALL has returned 2.02% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZWB is at 10.55% with +$10 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-20246810%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CALL
+6.79%+0.35%+2.02%+30.33%+50.41%
ZWB
+9.56%+9.84%+10.55%+54.48%+83.66%
Flows
CALL
+$0 M+$4 M+$2 M+$9 M+$57 M
ZWB
-$9 M+$2 M+$10 M-$45 M-$148 M

CALL vs ZWB exposure

Countries

CALL
USA
90.34%
Other
9.66%
ZWB
Canada
100.12%

Sectors

CALL
Financials
90.34%
Other
9.66%
ZWB
Financials
100.12%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CALL
CITIGROUP
5.22%
WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
5.20%
CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP
5.15%
THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP
5.13%
EAST WEST BANCORP
5.12%
PNC FINL SVC
5.09%
JPMORGAN CHASE
5.09%
KEYCORP
5.06%
BARRICK GOLD
5.06%
BK OF AMERICA CO
5.02%
ZWB
TORONTO DOMINION
16.89%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.86%
BNS
16.70%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.61%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.60%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.45%

Diversification

CALL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 19 total
51.14%
ZWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.12%

Characteristics

Compare
CALL
ZWB
ProviderEvolve ETFsBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield8.97%5.04%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 16, 2017January 28, 2011

Frequently asked questions about CALL and ZWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CALL or ZWB?
As of April 24, 2026, CALL has returned 2.02% year to date, while ZWB has returned 10.55%. ZWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CALL or ZWB?
As of April 24, 2026, CALL manages $119.86 M in assets, while ZWB manages $4.15 B. ZWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CALL and ZWB managed?
CALL is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. ZWB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CALL and ZWB emphasize?
CALL is most exposed to Financials and Materials. ZWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CALL or ZWB?
Year to date, CALL has seen +$2.41 M in net flows, compared with +$10.50 M for ZWB. ZWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CALL and ZWB compare?
CALL has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZWB has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of CALL and ZWB?
CALL's largest holdings include CITIGROUP, WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION, and CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP. ZWB's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, ROYAL BK CANADA, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CALL or ZWB?
CALL holds 19 securities, while ZWB holds 6. On holdings count, CALL is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CALL and ZWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds