VS
When evaluating costs, CGLO features a management fee (MER) of 0.8%, compared to 0.45% for FCIM. Performance-wise, CGLO has returned 10.62% year-to-date with -$29 M in net flows, whereas FCIM is at 13.5% with +$689 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGLO
FCIM
| AuM | $87.44 M | $1,895.41 M |
| Management Fees | 0.80% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.89% | 0.49% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.22% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGLO | +5.61% | +3.99% | +10.62% | +9.46% | +44.27% |
FCIM | -2.46% | -3.78% | +13.50% | +21.45% | +111.10% | |
| Flows | CGLO | -$10 M | -$12 M | -$29 M | -$45 M | -$14 M |
FCIM | +$30 M | +$117 M | +$689 M | +$871 M | +$1,553 M |
CGLO vs FCIM exposure
Countries
CGLO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIM
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CGLO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIM
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGLO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIM
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CGLO
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIM
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CGLO
FCIM
| Provider | CIBC | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada International Momentum GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.45% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 27, 2020 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about CGLO and FCIM
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGLO or FCIM?
As of October 15, 2026, CGLO has returned 10.62% year to date, while FCIM has returned 13.50%. FCIM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGLO or FCIM?
As of October 15, 2026, CGLO manages $87.44 M in assets, while FCIM manages $1.90 B. FCIM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGLO and FCIM managed?
CGLO is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. FCIM is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Momentum GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGLO or FCIM?
Year to date, CGLO has seen -$28.93 M in net flows, compared with +$688.77 M for FCIM. FCIM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGLO and FCIM compare?
CGLO has an expense ratio of 0.89%, while FCIM has an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Recent articles about CGLO and FCIM
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.