CIE
iShares International Fundamental Index ETF

Full CIE fund page
VS
VI
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF

Full VI fund page

Compare iShares International Fundamental Index ETF (CIE) vs Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (VI) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CIE and VI provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CIE features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.2% for VI. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-100-50050100%Sep 25Oct 25

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 23, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CIE
-3.06%+0.09%+18.71%+23.96%+97.62%
VI
-----
Flows
CIE
+$0 M+$0 M+$10 M+$14 M+$16 M
VI
-----

CIE vs VI exposure

Countries

CIE
Japan
22.92%
United Kingdom
12.87%
Republic of Korea
9.07%
Canada
8.72%
Germany
7.74%
France
7.57%
Other
31.11%
VI
Japan
23.55%
United Kingdom
11.83%
Republic of Korea
9.64%
Switzerland
7.99%
Germany
7.14%
France
7.05%
Other
32.79%

Sectors

CIE
Finance
23.31%
Technology
12.25%
Industrials
11.26%
Energy
10.53%
Non-Energy Materials
10.35%
Consumer Cyclicals
8.69%
Other
23.61%
VI
Finance
25.71%
Technology
17.17%
Industrials
15.63%
Healthcare
8.34%
Non-Energy Materials
7.52%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.11%
Other
18.52%
As of October 23, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CIE
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.37%
Shell Plc
2.01%
TotalEnergies SE
1.41%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.29%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.06%
Roche Holding AG
1.05%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.95%
Glencore Plc
0.88%
BP Plc
0.83%
SK hynix, Inc.
0.74%
VI
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.96%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.29%
ASML Holding NV
2.20%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.20%
Roche Holding AG
1.04%
Novartis AG
0.96%
Shell Plc
0.86%
Nestlé SA
0.85%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.85%
Siemens AG
0.82%

Diversification

CIE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,008 total
14.59%
VI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,640 total
14.01%

Characteristics

Compare
CIE
VI
ProvideriSharesVanguard
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkRAFI Fundamental Select Developed ex US 1000 NTR Index - CADFTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Hedged to CAD Net Tax Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Other
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.14%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 14, 2007December 1, 2015

Frequently asked questions about CIE and VI

How do the fees of CIE and VI compare?
CIE has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while VI has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What are the top holdings of CIE and VI?
CIE's largest holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Shell Plc, and TotalEnergies SE. VI's top holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SK hynix, Inc., and ASML Holding NV.
Which ETF is more diversified: CIE or VI?
CIE holds 1004 securities, while VI holds 3562. On holdings count, VI is the more diversified portfolio.
How are CIE and VI managed?
CIE is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select Developed ex US 1000 NTR Index - CAD benchmark. VI is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Hedged to CAD Net Tax Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CIE and VI emphasize?
CIE is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. VI is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.

Recent articles about CIE and VI

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds