VS
Compare iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CJP) vs Franklin FTSE Japan Index ETF (FLJA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CJP provides Finance, Industrials, and Technology exposures, while FLJA is primarily weighted in Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CJP features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.09% for FLJA. Performance-wise, CJP has returned 23.78% year-to-date with +$32 M in net flows, whereas FLJA is at 22.35% with -$14 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CJP
FLJA
| AuM | $176.00 M | $130.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.71% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.09% | -0.39% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CJP | +4.54% | +4.17% | +23.78% | +39.26% | +106.19% |
FLJA | +2.72% | +4.30% | +22.35% | +29.08% | +73.90% | |
| Flows | CJP | +$1 M | +$15 M | +$32 M | +$44 M | +$28 M |
FLJA | -$23 M | -$23 M | -$14 M | +$16 M | +$42 M |
CJP vs FLJA exposure
Countries
CJP
Japan
100.44%
FLJA
Japan
100.00%
Sectors
CJP
Finance
23.56%
Industrials
19.01%
Technology
17.30%
Consumer Cyclicals
10.01%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.21%
Other
20.90%
FLJA
Finance
21.89%
Technology
21.42%
Industrials
18.97%
Consumer Cyclicals
10.01%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.26%
Other
19.45%
As of September 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CJP
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
5.77%
Sony Group Corp.
3.32%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
3.32%
Toyota Motor Corp.
2.62%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.59%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.51%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.04%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.43%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.37%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.35%
FLJA
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.20%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.23%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.81%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.68%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.25%
Sony Group Corp.
2.15%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.07%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.02%
Advantest Corp.
1.97%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.69%
Diversification
CJP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 250 total
26.31%
FLJA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 450 total
25.06%
Characteristics
Compare
CJP
FLJA
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select Japan 250 NTR Index - CAD Hedged | FTSE Japan Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.14% | 0.56% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 14, 2007 | February 20, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CJP and FLJA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CJP or FLJA?
As of September 4, 2026, CJP has returned 23.78% year to date, while FLJA has returned 22.35%. CJP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CJP or FLJA?
As of September 4, 2026, CJP manages $176.00 M in assets, while FLJA manages $130.27 M. CJP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CJP and FLJA managed?
CJP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select Japan 250 NTR Index - CAD Hedged benchmark. FLJA is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the FTSE Japan Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CJP and FLJA emphasize?
CJP is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. FLJA is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CJP or FLJA?
Year to date, CJP has seen +$31.75 M in net flows, compared with -$14.07 M for FLJA. CJP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CJP and FLJA compare?
CJP has an expense ratio of 0.71%, while FLJA has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of CJP and FLJA?
CJP's largest holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Sony Group Corp., and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.. FLJA's top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp., and Tokyo Electron Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: CJP or FLJA?
CJP holds 250 securities, while FLJA holds 450. On holdings count, FLJA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CJP and FLJA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.