VS
CIBC Qx U.S. Low Volatility Dividend ETF (CQLU) and TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CQLU focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Utilities, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals, while TULV leans towards Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare, and Utilities. When evaluating costs, CQLU features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.3% for TULV. Performance-wise, CQLU has returned 8.75% year-to-date with +$219 M in net flows, whereas TULV is at 11.33% with -$13 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CQLU
TULV
| AuM | $1,177.89 M | $55.40 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.34% | 0.34% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CQLU | +3.97% | -4.08% | +8.75% | +7.12% | +42.02% |
TULV | +4.19% | +0.79% | +11.33% | +11.14% | +46.37% | |
| Flows | CQLU | +$4 M | +$42 M | +$219 M | +$218 M | +$1,175 M |
TULV | +$1 M | +$1 M | -$13 M | -$15 M | -$14 M |
CQLU vs TULV exposure
Countries
CQLU
USA
95.80%
TULV
USA
99.19%
Sectors
CQLU
Finance
31.76%
Utilities
17.44%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.65%
Industrials
10.44%
Healthcare
7.91%
Other
17.79%
TULV
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
24.64%
Healthcare
21.23%
Utilities
17.31%
Finance
11.94%
Technology
8.89%
Other
15.99%
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CQLU
Altria Group, Inc.
2.29%
The Southern Co.
2.14%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
2.12%
American Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.01%
Federal Realty Investment Trust
1.99%
Pfizer Inc.
1.95%
Kimco Realty Corp.
1.89%
Atmos Energy Corp.
1.85%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.84%
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
1.81%
TULV
Johnson & Johnson
3.38%
The Coca-Cola Co.
3.20%
General Dynamics Corp.
3.12%
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.94%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
2.88%
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
2.85%
PepsiCo, Inc.
2.80%
CME Group, Inc.
2.80%
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
2.69%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
2.66%
Diversification
CQLU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 75 total
19.88%
TULV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 83 total
29.30%
Characteristics
Compare
CQLU
TULV
| Provider | CIBC | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.76% | 1.10% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 16, 2021 | June 2, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about CQLU and TULV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CQLU or TULV?
As of October 28, 2026, CQLU has returned 8.75% year to date, while TULV has returned 11.33%. TULV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CQLU or TULV?
As of October 28, 2026, CQLU manages $1.18 B in assets, while TULV manages $55.40 M. CQLU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CQLU and TULV managed?
CQLU is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. TULV is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CQLU and TULV emphasize?
CQLU is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. TULV is most exposed to Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare, and Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CQLU or TULV?
Year to date, CQLU has seen +$218.84 M in net flows, compared with -$12.65 M for TULV. CQLU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CQLU and TULV compare?
CQLU has an expense ratio of 0.34%, while TULV has an expense ratio of 0.34%.
What are the top holdings of CQLU and TULV?
CQLU's largest holdings include Altria Group, Inc., The Southern Co., and Verizon Communications, Inc.. TULV's top holdings include Johnson & Johnson, The Coca-Cola Co., and General Dynamics Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CQLU or TULV?
CQLU holds 75 securities, while TULV holds 81. On holdings count, TULV is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CQLU and TULV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.