CRQ
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF

Full CRQ fund page
VS
FLVC
Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF

Full FLVC fund page

Compare iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ) vs Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CRQ provides Financials, Energy, and Materials exposures, while FLVC is primarily weighted in Financials, Utilities, and Energy. When evaluating costs, CRQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.15% for FLVC. Performance-wise, CRQ has returned 18.03% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas FLVC is at 15.06% with +$28 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.06.0%May 12May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CRQ
+4.27%+11.30%+18.03%+44.09%+104.66%
FLVC
+5.70%+12.21%+15.06%+30.38%-
Flows
CRQ
-$0 M+$2 M+$10 M+$7 M-$10 M
FLVC
+$2 M+$15 M+$28 M-$59 M-

CRQ vs FLVC exposure

Countries

CRQ
Canada
99.80%
FLVC
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

CRQ
Financials
41.62%
Energy
23.53%
Other
9.40%
Materials
8.19%
Other
17.25%
FLVC
Financials
41.45%
Utilities
13.39%
Energy
12.61%
Industrials
11.04%
Consumer Staples
8.57%
Other
12.94%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CRQ
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.94%
TORONTO DOMINION
7.60%
ENBRIDGE
5.73%
BNS
5.33%
BANK OF MONTREAL
4.39%
SUNCOR ENERGY
4.19%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.07%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
3.79%
MANULIFE-S
3.19%
CA11271J1075
3.17%
FLVC
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
6.08%
CDN NATL RAILWAY
5.39%
BANK OF MONTREAL
5.33%
ROYAL BK CANADA
5.28%
BNS
5.23%
SUN LIFE FINL
5.08%
FORTIS
4.89%
POWER CORPORATION OF CANADA
4.88%
TOURMALINE OIL
4.78%
SUNCOR ENERGY
4.58%

Diversification

CRQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
49.40%
FLVC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 43 total
51.53%

Characteristics

Compare
CRQ
FLVC
ProvideriSharesFranklin Templeton
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkFTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CADFranklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.86%4.78%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 22, 2006March 28, 2024

Frequently asked questions about CRQ and FLVC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CRQ or FLVC?
As of June 12, 2026, CRQ has returned 18.03% year to date, while FLVC has returned 15.06%. CRQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CRQ or FLVC?
As of June 12, 2026, CRQ manages $146.71 M in assets, while FLVC manages $54.76 M. CRQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CRQ and FLVC managed?
CRQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. FLVC is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CRQ and FLVC emphasize?
CRQ is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials. FLVC is most exposed to Financials, Utilities, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CRQ or FLVC?
Year to date, CRQ has seen +$10.17 M in net flows, compared with +$27.73 M for FLVC. FLVC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CRQ and FLVC compare?
CRQ has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while FLVC has an expense ratio of 0.16%.
What are the top holdings of CRQ and FLVC?
CRQ's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION. FLVC's top holdings include NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, CDN NATL RAILWAY, and BANK OF MONTREAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: CRQ or FLVC?
CRQ holds 90 securities, while FLVC holds 42. On holdings count, CRQ is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CRQ and FLVC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds