Compare iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ) vs Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CRQ provides Financials, Energy, and Materials exposures, while FLVC is primarily weighted in Financials, Utilities, and Energy. When evaluating costs, CRQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.15% for FLVC. Performance-wise, CRQ has returned 18.03% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas FLVC is at 15.06% with +$28 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
| AuM | $146.71 M | $54.76 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.16% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.14% | 3.30% |
Historical performance and flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CRQ | +4.27% | +11.30% | +18.03% | +44.09% | +104.66% |
FLVC | +5.70% | +12.21% | +15.06% | +30.38% | - | |
| Flows | CRQ | -$0 M | +$2 M | +$10 M | +$7 M | -$10 M |
FLVC | +$2 M | +$15 M | +$28 M | -$59 M | - |
CRQ vs FLVC exposure
Countries
Sectors
Top 10 Holdings
Diversification
Characteristics
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD | Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.86% | 4.78% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 22, 2006 | March 28, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about CRQ and FLVC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CRQ or FLVC?
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CRQ or FLVC?
How are CRQ and FLVC managed?
What sectors do CRQ and FLVC emphasize?
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CRQ or FLVC?
How do the fees of CRQ and FLVC compare?
What are the top holdings of CRQ and FLVC?
Which ETF is more diversified: CRQ or FLVC?
Recent articles about CRQ and FLVC

Looking for higher income and lower volatility? These Franklin Templeton ETFs may help
Franklin Templeton’s Low-Volatility High Dividend ETFs provide Canadian investors exposure to high dividend stocks with lower volatility, suited for economic cycles' ups and downs.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.




