VS
When evaluating costs, FCCL features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.2% for XEI. Performance-wise, FCCL has returned 15.2% year-to-date with +$386 M in net flows, whereas XEI is at 28.17% with +$811 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCCL
XEI
| AuM | $1,177.15 M | $4,434.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.43% | -0.39% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCCL | +2.27% | -0.02% | +15.20% | +19.38% | +76.26% |
XEI | +2.08% | +0.18% | +28.17% | +35.51% | +99.03% | |
| Flows | FCCL | +$32 M | +$92 M | +$386 M | +$501 M | +$935 M |
XEI | -$4 M | +$117 M | +$811 M | +$1,063 M | +$1,633 M |
FCCL vs XEI exposure
Countries
FCCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XEI
Canada
92.81%
Other
7.19%
Sectors
FCCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XEI
Finance
36.41%
Energy
30.52%
Utilities
9.08%
Telecommunications
7.23%
Other
16.77%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XEI
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
5.37%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.16%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
5.13%
Royal Bank of Canada
5.05%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.42%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.37%
TC Energy Corp.
4.23%
Bank of Montreal
4.23%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.98%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.70%
Diversification
FCCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XEI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 75 total
45.64%
Characteristics
Compare
FCCL
XEI
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada Canadian Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD | S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.00% | 3.40% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | April 12, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about FCCL and XEI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCCL or XEI?
As of October 16, 2026, FCCL has returned 15.20% year to date, while XEI has returned 28.17%. XEI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCCL or XEI?
As of October 16, 2026, FCCL manages $1.18 B in assets, while XEI manages $4.43 B. XEI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCCL and XEI managed?
FCCL is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XEI is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCCL or XEI?
Year to date, FCCL has seen +$386.36 M in net flows, compared with +$810.75 M for XEI. XEI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCCL and XEI compare?
FCCL has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XEI has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
Recent articles about FCCL and XEI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.