VS
When evaluating costs, FCCL features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.15% for XIU. Performance-wise, FCCL has returned 14.22% year-to-date with +$384 M in net flows, whereas XIU is at 16.97% with +$291 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCCL
XIU
| AuM | $1,164.69 M | $23,757.22 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.43% | 0.51% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCCL | +1.67% | -0.74% | +14.22% | +17.91% | +74.76% |
XIU | +2.28% | +2.66% | +16.97% | +21.67% | +96.49% | |
| Flows | FCCL | +$30 M | +$92 M | +$384 M | +$498 M | +$932 M |
XIU | +$847 M | -$752 M | +$291 M | +$1,499 M | +$2,609 M |
FCCL vs XIU exposure
Countries
FCCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIU
Canada
97.63%
Sectors
FCCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIU
Finance
46.47%
Energy
17.04%
Non-Energy Materials
14.13%
Other
22.36%
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIU
Royal Bank of Canada
9.54%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
6.75%
Shopify, Inc.
6.00%
Bank of Montreal
3.99%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.75%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.69%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
3.49%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.49%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
3.44%
Brookfield Corp.
2.94%
Diversification
FCCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
47.08%
Characteristics
Compare
FCCL
XIU
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada Canadian Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD | S&P / TSX 60 Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.01% | 2.10% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | September 28, 1999 |
Frequently asked questions about FCCL and XIU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCCL or XIU?
As of October 15, 2026, FCCL has returned 14.22% year to date, while XIU has returned 16.97%. XIU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCCL or XIU?
As of October 15, 2026, FCCL manages $1.16 B in assets, while XIU manages $23.76 B. XIU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCCL and XIU managed?
FCCL is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XIU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P / TSX 60 Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCCL or XIU?
Year to date, FCCL has seen +$383.96 M in net flows, compared with +$291.40 M for XIU. FCCL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCCL and XIU compare?
FCCL has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XIU has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Recent articles about FCCL and XIU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.