VS
Compare Franklin FTSE Japan Index ETF (FLJA) vs iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CJP) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FLJA provides Technology, Finance, and Industrials exposures, while CJP is primarily weighted in Industrials, Technology, and Finance. When evaluating costs, FLJA features a management fee (MER) of 0.09%, compared to 0.65% for CJP. Performance-wise, FLJA has returned 19.83% year-to-date with -$14 M in net flows, whereas CJP is at 22.02% with +$25 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLJA
CJP
| AuM | $127.59 M | $166.87 M |
| Management Fees | 0.09% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.10% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.37% | -0.13% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLJA | -2.68% | +4.35% | +19.83% | +18.89% | +79.27% |
CJP | +0.07% | +1.78% | +22.02% | +27.70% | +111.08% | |
| Flows | FLJA | +$0 M | -$23 M | -$14 M | -$4 M | +$42 M |
CJP | -$7 M | -$6 M | +$25 M | +$25 M | +$15 M |
FLJA vs CJP exposure
Countries
FLJA
Japan
100.00%
CJP
Japan
101.22%
Sectors
FLJA
Technology
22.88%
Finance
21.10%
Industrials
18.81%
Consumer Cyclicals
9.61%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.01%
Other
19.60%
CJP
Industrials
19.12%
Technology
16.34%
Finance
15.88%
Consumer Cyclicals
14.40%
Non-Energy Materials
9.83%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.87%
Other
15.56%
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLJA
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.07%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.16%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.53%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.51%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.48%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.34%
Advantest Corp.
2.33%
Sony Group Corp.
2.20%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
2.12%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.11%
CJP
Toyota Motor Corp.
4.14%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
2.50%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
2.17%
Sony Group Corp.
2.15%
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
2.03%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.02%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.98%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.83%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
1.81%
ITOCHU Corp.
1.64%
Diversification
FLJA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 417 total
25.84%
CJP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 250 total
22.27%
Characteristics
Compare
FLJA
CJP
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE Japan Index NTR - CAD | RAFI Fundamental Select Japan 250 NTR Index - CAD Hedged |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.57% | 1.15% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 20, 2019 | February 14, 2007 |
Frequently asked questions about FLJA and CJP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLJA or CJP?
As of October 29, 2026, FLJA has returned 19.83% year to date, while CJP has returned 22.02%. CJP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLJA or CJP?
As of October 29, 2026, FLJA manages $127.59 M in assets, while CJP manages $166.87 M. CJP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLJA and CJP managed?
FLJA is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the FTSE Japan Index NTR - CAD benchmark. CJP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select Japan 250 NTR Index - CAD Hedged benchmark.
What sectors do FLJA and CJP emphasize?
FLJA is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. CJP is most exposed to Industrials, Technology, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLJA or CJP?
Year to date, FLJA has seen -$14.08 M in net flows, compared with +$24.98 M for CJP. CJP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLJA and CJP compare?
FLJA has an expense ratio of 0.10%, while CJP has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of FLJA and CJP?
FLJA's largest holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp., and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.. CJP's top holdings include Toyota Motor Corp., Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., and Panasonic Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLJA or CJP?
FLJA holds 417 securities, while CJP holds 250. On holdings count, FLJA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FLJA and CJP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.