Compare Franklin FTSE Japan Index ETF (FLJA) vs BMO Japan Index ETF (ZJPN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FLJA and ZJPN provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Industrials, and Finance. When evaluating costs, FLJA features a management fee (MER) of 0.09%, compared to 0.35% for ZJPN. Performance-wise, FLJA has returned 20.28% year-to-date with +$9 M in net flows, whereas ZJPN is at 18.95% with +$118 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLJA
ZJPN
| AuM | $151.35 M | $693.69 M |
| Management Fees | 0.09% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.10% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.38% | 0.60% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLJA | +3.68% | +13.02% | +20.28% | +35.76% | +77.56% |
ZJPN | +2.99% | +11.77% | +18.95% | +34.10% | +75.21% | |
| Flows | FLJA | +$0 M | -$66 M | +$9 M | +$49 M | +$65 M |
ZJPN | +$3 M | +$17 M | +$118 M | +$137 M | -$190 M |
FLJA vs ZJPN exposure
Countries
FLJA
Japan
100.00%
ZJPN
Japan
100.00%
Sectors
FLJA
Technology
20.43%
Industrials
19.77%
Finance
19.65%
Consumer Cyclicals
10.34%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.34%
Non-Energy Materials
7.11%
Other
14.37%
ZJPN
Technology
21.18%
Industrials
20.01%
Finance
19.27%
Consumer Cyclicals
10.20%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.21%
Other
21.13%
As of July 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLJA
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
3.53%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.41%
SoftBank Group Corp.
3.04%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.47%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.29%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.27%
Sony Group Corp.
2.26%
Advantest Corp.
1.96%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.85%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.77%
ZJPN
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
3.77%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.54%
SoftBank Group Corp.
3.02%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.64%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.50%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.46%
Sony Group Corp.
2.28%
Advantest Corp.
2.16%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.95%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.87%
Diversification
FLJA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 452 total
24.86%
ZJPN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 305 total
26.19%
Characteristics
Compare
FLJA
ZJPN
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE Japan Index NTR - CAD | Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.56% | 1.15% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 20, 2019 | January 17, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about FLJA and ZJPN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLJA or ZJPN?
As of July 2, 2026, FLJA has returned 20.28% year to date, while ZJPN has returned 18.95%. FLJA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLJA or ZJPN?
As of July 2, 2026, FLJA manages $151.35 M in assets, while ZJPN manages $693.69 M. ZJPN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLJA and ZJPN managed?
FLJA is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the FTSE Japan Index NTR - CAD benchmark. ZJPN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do FLJA and ZJPN emphasize?
FLJA is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Finance. ZJPN is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLJA or ZJPN?
Year to date, FLJA has seen +$9.34 M in net flows, compared with +$118.16 M for ZJPN. ZJPN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLJA and ZJPN compare?
FLJA has an expense ratio of 0.10%, while ZJPN has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of FLJA and ZJPN?
FLJA's largest holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp., and SoftBank Group Corp.. ZJPN's top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp., and SoftBank Group Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLJA or ZJPN?
FLJA holds 452 securities, while ZJPN holds 305. On holdings count, FLJA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FLJA and ZJPN
ETF Comparison: FLJA vs. ZJPN
A side-by-side comparison of two Canadian Japan equity ETFs, Franklin's FLJA and BMO's ZJPN, where a lower fee sets FLJA apart.
Posted Today at 11:55 AM by Kyle Anthony inJapan
Japan ETFs Rally as Takaichi Win Drives Global Flows
Political stability and structural reform lift Japan equities — and Canadian-listed ETFs are following.
Posted on 2/16/2026 by ETF Market Canada inJapan
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.