VS
When evaluating costs, HLIT features a management fee (MER) of 0.89%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, HLIT has returned 6.52% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.36% with +$425 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HLIT
ZEB
| AuM | $20.86 M | $7,427.67 M |
| Management Fees | 0.89% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.89% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.54% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HLIT | +7.29% | -15.15% | +6.52% | +51.46% | -29.89% |
ZEB | -0.32% | +11.06% | +32.36% | +55.47% | +161.28% | |
| Flows | HLIT | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$1 M | +$2 M | -$2 M |
ZEB | +$377 M | +$1,600 M | +$425 M | +$761 M | -$338 M |
HLIT vs ZEB exposure
Countries
HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
HLIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
HLIT
ZEB
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Lithium Producers Index NTR - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.11% | 2.31% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 23, 2021 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about HLIT and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HLIT or ZEB?
As of September 3, 2026, HLIT has returned 6.52% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.36%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HLIT or ZEB?
As of September 3, 2026, HLIT manages $20.86 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.43 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HLIT and ZEB managed?
HLIT is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Lithium Producers Index NTR - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HLIT or ZEB?
Year to date, HLIT has seen -$0.57 M in net flows, compared with +$425.30 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HLIT and ZEB compare?
HLIT has an expense ratio of 0.89%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about HLIT and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.