MCSB
Mackenzie Canadian Short Term Fixed Income ETF

Full MCSB fund page
VS
ZAG
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF

Full ZAG fund page

When evaluating costs, MCSB features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.08% for ZAG. Performance-wise, MCSB has returned 0.48% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas ZAG is at 0.62% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.2-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20.0%Sep 1Sep 9Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
MCSB
-0.54%-0.93%+0.48%+0.80%+15.74%
ZAG
-0.66%-2.31%-0.62%-0.88%+14.95%
Flows
MCSB
-$5 M+$1 M+$1 M+$1 M+$19 M
ZAG
-$71 M+$457 M+$1,194 M+$1,978 M+$7,233 M

MCSB vs ZAG exposure

Countries

MCSB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Canada
95.65%

Sectors

MCSB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Sovereign
34.55%
Municipal
30.89%
Finance
11.07%
Government Agencies
9.38%
Other
14.10%
As of October 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

MCSB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Canada, Bonds 3% 1jun2034, CAD
4.28%
Canada, Bonds 2.5% 1nov2027, CAD
3.69%
Canada, Bonds 2.25% 1feb2028, CAD
2.94%
Canada, Bond 2.25 1jun2029 10Y
2.90%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1dec2055, CAD
2.84%
Canada Housing Trust, 1.1% 15mar2031, CAD (95)
2.68%
Province of Quebec, 3.5% 1dec2048, CAD (B117)
2.38%
Bank of Montreal, 3.19% 1mar2028, CAD
2.22%
Province of Quebec, 2.75% 1sep2028, CAD (B124)
2.21%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2030, CAD
2.19%

Diversification

MCSB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 86 total
28.34%

Characteristics

Compare
MCSB
ZAG
ProviderMackenzie InvestmentsBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD
Replication Method-Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeFixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.59%3.50%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 22, 2017January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about MCSB and ZAG

Which ETF has performed better year to date: MCSB or ZAG?
As of October 1, 2026, MCSB has returned 0.48% year to date, while ZAG has returned -0.62%. MCSB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: MCSB or ZAG?
As of October 1, 2026, MCSB manages $37.41 M in assets, while ZAG manages $12.98 B. ZAG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are MCSB and ZAG managed?
MCSB is actively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It does not track an index. ZAG is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: MCSB or ZAG?
Year to date, MCSB has seen +$1.05 M in net flows, compared with +$1,193.99 M for ZAG. ZAG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of MCSB and ZAG compare?
MCSB has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while ZAG has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about MCSB and ZAG

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds