VS
When evaluating costs, NSGE features a management fee (MER) of 0.74%, compared to 0.45% for FCIM. Performance-wise, NSGE has returned 6.23% year-to-date with -$219 M in net flows, whereas FCIM is at 9.83% with +$714 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
NSGE
FCIM
| AuM | $75.82 M | $1,859.76 M |
| Management Fees | 0.74% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.49% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.00% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NSGE | -0.31% | +0.45% | +6.23% | +1.51% | +29.47% |
FCIM | -5.26% | -8.10% | +9.83% | +14.61% | +99.47% | |
| Flows | NSGE | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$219 M | -$410 M | -$503 M |
FCIM | +$40 M | +$111 M | +$714 M | +$837 M | +$1,575 M |
NSGE vs FCIM exposure
Countries
NSGE
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIM
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
NSGE
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIM
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
NSGE
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIM
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
NSGE
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIM
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
NSGE
FCIM
| Provider | National Bank Investments | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada International Momentum GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.50% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | January 23, 2020 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about NSGE and FCIM
Which ETF has performed better year to date: NSGE or FCIM?
As of November 11, 2026, NSGE has returned 6.23% year to date, while FCIM has returned 9.83%. FCIM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: NSGE or FCIM?
As of November 11, 2026, NSGE manages $75.82 M in assets, while FCIM manages $1.86 B. FCIM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are NSGE and FCIM managed?
NSGE is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index. FCIM is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Momentum GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: NSGE or FCIM?
Year to date, NSGE has seen -$219.12 M in net flows, compared with +$713.98 M for FCIM. FCIM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of NSGE and FCIM compare?
NSGE has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while FCIM has an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Recent articles about NSGE and FCIM
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.