VS
When evaluating costs, PSA features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.08% for ZAG. Performance-wise, PSA has returned 1.86% year-to-date with +$230 M in net flows, whereas ZAG is at 1.62% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
PSA
ZAG
| AuM | $3,434.64 M | $13,650.49 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSA | +0.19% | +0.56% | +1.86% | +2.20% | +10.16% |
ZAG | +2.06% | +0.76% | +1.62% | +0.39% | +14.99% | |
| Flows | PSA | +$102 M | +$267 M | +$230 M | +$145 M | -$574 M |
ZAG | +$368 M | +$399 M | +$1,608 M | +$2,163 M | +$7,679 M |
PSA vs ZAG exposure
Countries
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Canada
95.65%
Sectors
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Sovereign
34.55%
Municipal
30.80%
Finance
11.12%
Government Agencies
9.39%
Other
14.14%
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Canada, Bonds 3% 1jun2034, CAD
4.26%
Canada, Bonds 2.5% 1nov2027, CAD
3.74%
Canada, Bonds 2.25% 1feb2028, CAD
2.97%
Canada, Bond 2.25 1jun2029 10Y
2.92%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1dec2055, CAD
2.80%
Canada Housing Trust, 1.1% 15mar2031, CAD (95)
2.69%
Province of Quebec, 3.5% 1dec2048, CAD (B117)
2.35%
Bank of Montreal, 3.19% 1mar2028, CAD
2.25%
Province of Quebec, 2.75% 1sep2028, CAD (B124)
2.23%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2030, CAD
2.20%
Diversification
PSA
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 86 total
28.40%
Characteristics
Compare
PSA
ZAG
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.17% | 3.42% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 10, 2013 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about PSA and ZAG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: PSA or ZAG?
As of November 5, 2026, PSA has returned 1.86% year to date, while ZAG has returned 1.62%. PSA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: PSA or ZAG?
As of November 5, 2026, PSA manages $3.43 B in assets, while ZAG manages $13.65 B. ZAG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are PSA and ZAG managed?
PSA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZAG is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: PSA or ZAG?
Year to date, PSA has seen +$229.80 M in net flows, compared with +$1,608.48 M for ZAG. ZAG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of PSA and ZAG compare?
PSA has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while ZAG has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about PSA and ZAG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.