VS
When evaluating costs, RNAV features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.35% for FCUV. Performance-wise, RNAV has returned 12.63% year-to-date with +$40 M in net flows, whereas FCUV is at 16.03% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RNAV
FCUV
| AuM | $109.34 M | $4,538.54 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.80% | 0.38% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.83% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 23, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RNAV | +0.48% | +1.68% | +12.63% | +15.78% | +81.44% |
FCUV | -0.16% | -1.19% | +16.03% | +22.23% | +106.36% | |
| Flows | RNAV | +$4 M | +$10 M | +$40 M | +$17 M | +$81 M |
FCUV | +$272 M | +$654 M | +$1,948 M | +$2,246 M | +$3,500 M |
RNAV vs FCUV exposure
Countries
RNAV
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
RNAV
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 23, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RNAV
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
RNAV
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
RNAV
FCUV
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.18% | 1.51% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 8, 2023 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about RNAV and FCUV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RNAV or FCUV?
As of October 23, 2026, RNAV has returned 12.63% year to date, while FCUV has returned 16.03%. FCUV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RNAV or FCUV?
As of October 23, 2026, RNAV manages $109.34 M in assets, while FCUV manages $4.54 B. FCUV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RNAV and FCUV managed?
RNAV is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. FCUV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RNAV or FCUV?
Year to date, RNAV has seen +$39.56 M in net flows, compared with +$1,947.89 M for FCUV. FCUV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RNAV and FCUV compare?
RNAV has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while FCUV has an expense ratio of 0.38%.
Recent articles about RNAV and FCUV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.