VS
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV) and CIBC Qx U.S. Low Volatility Dividend ETF (CQLU) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TULV focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare, and Utilities, while CQLU leans towards Finance, Utilities, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, TULV features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.3% for CQLU. Performance-wise, TULV has returned 18.3% year-to-date with -$13 M in net flows, whereas CQLU is at 16.08% with +$216 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TULV
CQLU
| AuM | $58.86 M | $1,251.92 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.34% | 0.34% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TULV | +8.28% | +9.92% | +18.30% | +15.66% | +51.31% |
CQLU | +8.53% | +7.09% | +16.08% | +13.40% | +47.79% | |
| Flows | TULV | +$1 M | +$1 M | -$13 M | -$15 M | -$12 M |
CQLU | -$6 M | +$42 M | +$216 M | +$213 M | +$1,172 M |
TULV vs CQLU exposure
Countries
TULV
USA
98.66%
CQLU
USA
95.85%
Sectors
TULV
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
22.95%
Healthcare
21.76%
Utilities
15.53%
Finance
12.84%
Technology
10.80%
Other
16.13%
CQLU
Finance
32.54%
Utilities
17.53%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
14.80%
Industrials
10.41%
Healthcare
7.75%
Other
16.97%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TULV
The Coca-Cola Co.
3.05%
Merck & Co., Inc.
3.02%
Johnson & Johnson
3.01%
Visa, Inc.
2.99%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.97%
General Dynamics Corp.
2.88%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
2.87%
CME Group, Inc.
2.69%
PepsiCo, Inc.
2.65%
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
2.62%
CQLU
Altria Group, Inc.
2.40%
The Southern Co.
2.14%
Pfizer Inc.
2.08%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
2.07%
American Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.07%
Federal Realty Investment Trust
1.98%
Kimco Realty Corp.
1.89%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.86%
Atmos Energy Corp.
1.85%
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
1.85%
Diversification
TULV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 85 total
28.77%
CQLU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 75 total
20.20%
Characteristics
Compare
TULV
CQLU
| Provider | TD Asset Management | CIBC |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.03% | 1.68% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 2, 2020 | November 16, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about TULV and CQLU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TULV or CQLU?
As of November 11, 2026, TULV has returned 18.30% year to date, while CQLU has returned 16.08%. TULV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TULV or CQLU?
As of November 11, 2026, TULV manages $58.86 M in assets, while CQLU manages $1.25 B. CQLU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TULV and CQLU managed?
TULV is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. CQLU is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index.
What sectors do TULV and CQLU emphasize?
TULV is most exposed to Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare, and Utilities. CQLU is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TULV or CQLU?
Year to date, TULV has seen -$12.65 M in net flows, compared with +$215.76 M for CQLU. CQLU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TULV and CQLU compare?
TULV has an expense ratio of 0.34%, while CQLU has an expense ratio of 0.34%.
What are the top holdings of TULV and CQLU?
TULV's largest holdings include The Coca-Cola Co., Merck & Co., Inc., and Johnson & Johnson. CQLU's top holdings include Altria Group, Inc., The Southern Co., and Pfizer Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: TULV or CQLU?
TULV holds 83 securities, while CQLU holds 75. On holdings count, TULV is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about TULV and CQLU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.