VS
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV) and CI Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF (EQL.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TULV focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare, and Utilities, while EQL.U leans towards Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, TULV features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.25% for EQL.U. Performance-wise, TULV has returned 18.3% year-to-date with -$13 M in net flows, whereas EQL.U is at 17.3% with +$22 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TULV
EQL.U
| AuM | $58.86 M | $95.98 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.34% | 0.25% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.65% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TULV | +8.28% | +9.92% | +18.30% | +15.66% | +51.31% |
EQL.U | +4.36% | +1.20% | +17.30% | +18.83% | +64.56% | |
| Flows | TULV | +$1 M | +$1 M | -$13 M | -$15 M | -$12 M |
EQL.U | +$3 M | +$19 M | +$22 M | +$18 M | -$5 M |
TULV vs EQL.U exposure
Countries
TULV
USA
98.66%
EQL.U
USA
96.10%
Sectors
TULV
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
22.95%
Healthcare
21.76%
Utilities
15.53%
Finance
12.84%
Technology
10.80%
Other
16.13%
EQL.U
Finance
20.18%
Technology
16.45%
Industrials
14.49%
Healthcare
12.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.71%
Other
28.59%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TULV
The Coca-Cola Co.
3.05%
Merck & Co., Inc.
3.02%
Johnson & Johnson
3.01%
Visa, Inc.
2.99%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.97%
General Dynamics Corp.
2.88%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
2.87%
CME Group, Inc.
2.69%
PepsiCo, Inc.
2.65%
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
2.62%
EQL.U
US46137V3574
101.03%
Diversification
TULV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 85 total
28.77%
EQL.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
101.03%
Characteristics
Compare
TULV
EQL.U
| Provider | TD Asset Management | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 Equal Weight Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | - | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.03% | 1.40% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 2, 2020 | May 29, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about TULV and EQL.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TULV or EQL.U?
As of November 11, 2026, TULV has returned 18.30% year to date, while EQL.U has returned 17.30%. TULV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TULV or EQL.U?
As of November 11, 2026, TULV manages $58.86 M in assets, while EQL.U manages $95.98 M. EQL.U is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TULV and EQL.U managed?
TULV is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. EQL.U is passively managed by CI. It tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: TULV or EQL.U?
TULV holds 83 securities, while EQL.U holds 1. On holdings count, TULV is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TULV or EQL.U?
Year to date, TULV has seen -$12.65 M in net flows, compared with +$21.52 M for EQL.U. EQL.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TULV and EQL.U compare?
TULV has an expense ratio of 0.34%, while EQL.U has an expense ratio of 0.25%.
What sectors do TULV and EQL.U emphasize?
TULV is most exposed to Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare, and Utilities. EQL.U is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Recent articles about TULV and EQL.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.