VS
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV) and CI Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF (PXU.F) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that TULV focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare, and Utilities, while PXU.F leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, TULV features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.44% for PXU.F. Performance-wise, TULV has returned 18.3% year-to-date with -$13 M in net flows, whereas PXU.F is at 19.93% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
TULV
PXU.F
| AuM | $58.86 M | $67.85 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.44% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.34% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TULV | +8.28% | +9.92% | +18.30% | +15.66% | +51.31% |
PXU.F | +1.53% | +1.19% | +19.93% | +21.84% | +76.60% | |
| Flows | TULV | +$1 M | +$1 M | -$13 M | -$15 M | -$12 M |
PXU.F | +$2 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | -$64 M |
TULV vs PXU.F exposure
Countries
TULV
USA
98.66%
PXU.F
USA
100.19%
Sectors
TULV
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
22.95%
Healthcare
21.76%
Utilities
15.53%
Finance
12.84%
Technology
10.80%
Other
16.13%
PXU.F
Technology
26.93%
Finance
19.12%
Healthcare
13.33%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.03%
Energy
8.40%
Industrials
7.82%
Other
14.35%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
TULV
The Coca-Cola Co.
3.05%
Merck & Co., Inc.
3.02%
Johnson & Johnson
3.01%
Visa, Inc.
2.99%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.97%
General Dynamics Corp.
2.88%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
2.87%
CME Group, Inc.
2.69%
PepsiCo, Inc.
2.65%
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
2.62%
PXU.F
US46137V6130
103.15%
Diversification
TULV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 85 total
28.77%
PXU.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 994 total
103.15%
Characteristics
Compare
TULV
PXU.F
| Provider | TD Asset Management | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index - USD |
| Replication Method | - | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.03% | 1.23% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 2, 2020 | January 26, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about TULV and PXU.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: TULV or PXU.F?
As of November 11, 2026, TULV has returned 18.30% year to date, while PXU.F has returned 19.93%. PXU.F is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: TULV or PXU.F?
As of November 11, 2026, TULV manages $58.86 M in assets, while PXU.F manages $67.85 M. PXU.F is the larger fund by AUM.
How are TULV and PXU.F managed?
TULV is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index. PXU.F is passively managed by CI. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: TULV or PXU.F?
TULV holds 83 securities, while PXU.F holds 1. On holdings count, TULV is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: TULV or PXU.F?
Year to date, TULV has seen -$12.65 M in net flows, compared with +$1.67 M for PXU.F. PXU.F has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of TULV and PXU.F compare?
TULV has an expense ratio of 0.34%, while PXU.F has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What sectors do TULV and PXU.F emphasize?
TULV is most exposed to Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Healthcare, and Utilities. PXU.F is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Recent articles about TULV and PXU.F
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.