VS
Compare Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) vs Franklin FTSE U.S. Index ETF (FLAM) to find the best fit for your portfolio. VFV and FLAM provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, VFV features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.07% for FLAM. Performance-wise, VFV has returned 13.98% year-to-date with +$3 B in net flows, whereas FLAM is at 14.02% with -$48 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
VFV
FLAM
| AuM | $34,996.54 M | $427.35 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.07% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.17% | 0.12% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | VFV | +1.75% | +5.50% | +13.98% | +20.85% | +85.29% |
FLAM | +1.92% | +5.69% | +14.02% | +20.70% | +85.19% | |
| Flows | VFV | +$509 M | +$1,796 M | +$3,454 M | +$4,751 M | +$14,651 M |
FLAM | +$12 M | -$18 M | -$48 M | -$27 M | +$38 M |
VFV vs FLAM exposure
Countries
VFV
USA
96.91%
FLAM
USA
97.25%
Sectors
VFV
Technology
45.60%
Finance
12.94%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Healthcare
8.64%
Industrials
7.92%
Other
16.18%
FLAM
Technology
45.08%
Finance
13.51%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.04%
Healthcare
9.00%
Industrials
7.70%
Other
15.67%
As of August 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
VFV
NVIDIA Corp.
7.48%
Apple, Inc.
6.56%
Microsoft Corp.
4.28%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.23%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.58%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.01%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%
Tesla, Inc.
1.83%
FLAM
NVIDIA Corp.
7.12%
Apple, Inc.
6.50%
Microsoft Corp.
4.39%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.58%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.12%
Broadcom Inc.
2.69%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.52%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.92%
Tesla, Inc.
1.75%
Diversification
VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
36.23%
FLAM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 495 total
35.63%
Characteristics
Compare
VFV
FLAM
| Provider | Vanguard | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD | FTSE USA NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.84% | 0.88% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 2, 2012 | February 20, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about VFV and FLAM
Which ETF has performed better year to date: VFV or FLAM?
As of August 19, 2026, VFV has returned 13.98% year to date, while FLAM has returned 14.02%. FLAM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VFV or FLAM?
As of August 19, 2026, VFV manages $35.00 B in assets, while FLAM manages $427.35 M. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VFV and FLAM managed?
VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark. FLAM is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the FTSE USA NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do VFV and FLAM emphasize?
VFV is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. FLAM is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VFV or FLAM?
Year to date, VFV has seen +$3,453.59 M in net flows, compared with -$47.61 M for FLAM. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VFV and FLAM compare?
VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while FLAM has an expense ratio of 0.08%.
What are the top holdings of VFV and FLAM?
VFV's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. FLAM's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: VFV or FLAM?
VFV holds 496 securities, while FLAM holds 484. On holdings count, VFV is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about VFV and FLAM
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.