VS
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XSP) and BMO US Equity Buffer Hedged to CAD ETF – July (ZJUL) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XSP focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while ZJUL leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XSP features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.73% for ZJUL. Performance-wise, XSP has returned 11.03% year-to-date with +$793 M in net flows, whereas ZJUL is at 5.71% with +$51 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XSP
ZJUL
| AuM | $16,025.65 M | $112.00 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.73% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.73% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XSP | -0.94% | +0.49% | +11.03% | +18.19% | +67.70% |
ZJUL | +0.50% | +2.62% | +5.71% | +8.63% | - | |
| Flows | XSP | +$52 M | +$322 M | +$793 M | +$1,098 M | +$2,002 M |
ZJUL | +$0 M | +$51 M | +$51 M | +$54 M | - |
XSP vs ZJUL exposure
Countries
XSP
USA
96.39%
ZJUL
USA
94.88%
Sectors
XSP
Technology
44.71%
Finance
14.00%
Healthcare
8.98%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.93%
Industrials
7.58%
Other
15.80%
ZJUL
Technology
44.09%
Finance
13.82%
Healthcare
8.83%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.81%
Industrials
7.50%
Other
16.95%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XSP
Apple, Inc.
7.64%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.37%
Microsoft Corp.
5.23%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.05%
Broadcom Inc.
2.86%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.46%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.85%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.47%
ZJUL
Apple, Inc.
7.53%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.27%
Microsoft Corp.
5.15%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.01%
Broadcom Inc.
2.83%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.43%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.82%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.52%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.44%
Diversification
XSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
37.06%
ZJUL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
36.56%
Characteristics
Compare
XSP
ZJUL
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.12% | 0.46% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 24, 2001 | July 2, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about XSP and ZJUL
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XSP or ZJUL?
As of September 2, 2026, XSP has returned 11.03% year to date, while ZJUL has returned 5.71%. XSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XSP or ZJUL?
As of September 2, 2026, XSP manages $16.03 B in assets, while ZJUL manages $112.00 M. XSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XSP and ZJUL managed?
XSP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZJUL is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XSP and ZJUL emphasize?
XSP is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. ZJUL is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XSP or ZJUL?
Year to date, XSP has seen +$792.91 M in net flows, compared with +$51.11 M for ZJUL. XSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XSP and ZJUL compare?
XSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while ZJUL has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
What are the top holdings of XSP and ZJUL?
XSP's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. ZJUL's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XSP or ZJUL?
XSP holds 496 securities, while ZJUL holds 494. On holdings count, XSP is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XSP and ZJUL
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.