VS
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS) and BMO US Equity Buffer Hedged to CAD ETF (ZOCT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XUS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while ZOCT leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.73% for ZOCT. Performance-wise, XUS has returned 13.88% year-to-date with +$1 B in net flows, whereas ZOCT is at 6.07% with +$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XUS
ZOCT
| AuM | $13,252.84 M | $45.33 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.73% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.73% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.27% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XUS | -2.24% | +1.09% | +13.88% | +21.11% | +78.56% |
ZOCT | +0.58% | +1.65% | +6.07% | +9.31% | - | |
| Flows | XUS | +$146 M | +$458 M | +$1,432 M | +$1,802 M | +$3,609 M |
ZOCT | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$4 M | - |
XUS vs ZOCT exposure
Countries
XUS
USA
96.39%
ZOCT
USA
98.89%
Sectors
XUS
Technology
44.71%
Finance
14.00%
Healthcare
8.98%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.93%
Industrials
7.58%
Other
15.80%
ZOCT
Technology
45.95%
Finance
14.40%
Healthcare
9.20%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.19%
Industrials
7.82%
Other
13.44%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XUS
Apple, Inc.
7.64%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.37%
Microsoft Corp.
5.23%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.05%
Broadcom Inc.
2.86%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.46%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.85%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.47%
ZOCT
Apple, Inc.
7.85%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.58%
Microsoft Corp.
5.37%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.70%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.14%
Broadcom Inc.
2.95%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.53%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.59%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.50%
Diversification
XUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
37.06%
ZOCT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
38.11%
Characteristics
Compare
XUS
ZOCT
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.12% | 0.45% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 10, 2013 | October 2, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about XUS and ZOCT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUS or ZOCT?
As of September 2, 2026, XUS has returned 13.88% year to date, while ZOCT has returned 6.07%. XUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUS or ZOCT?
As of September 2, 2026, XUS manages $13.25 B in assets, while ZOCT manages $45.33 M. XUS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUS and ZOCT managed?
XUS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZOCT is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XUS and ZOCT emphasize?
XUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. ZOCT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUS or ZOCT?
Year to date, XUS has seen +$1,431.72 M in net flows, compared with +$0.11 M for ZOCT. XUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUS and ZOCT compare?
XUS has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while ZOCT has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
What are the top holdings of XUS and ZOCT?
XUS's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. ZOCT's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUS or ZOCT?
XUS holds 496 securities, while ZOCT holds 494. On holdings count, XUS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XUS and ZOCT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.