When evaluating costs, ZCOM features a management fee (MER) of 0.29%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, ZCOM has returned 22.16% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 13.34% with +$391 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZCOM
ZSP
| AuM | $588.12 M | $24,217.48 M |
| Management Fees | 0.29% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.29% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 8, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZCOM | -2.08% | +0.31% | +22.16% | - | - |
ZSP | +2.66% | +13.20% | +13.34% | +25.63% | +86.84% | |
| Flows | ZCOM | -$352 M | -$442 M | +$10 M | - | - |
ZSP | +$51 M | +$222 M | +$391 M | +$1,172 M | +$4,840 M |
ZCOM vs ZSP exposure
Countries
ZCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.86%
Sectors
ZCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
46.52%
Finance
12.65%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.38%
Healthcare
8.23%
Industrials
7.68%
Other
15.54%
As of July 8, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
8.04%
Apple, Inc.
7.08%
Microsoft Corp.
4.89%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.51%
Broadcom Inc.
3.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.15%
Tesla, Inc.
1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.61%
Diversification
ZCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
39.24%
Characteristics
Compare
ZCOM
ZSP
| Provider | BMO | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return Index - USD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 23, 2025 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about ZCOM and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZCOM or ZSP?
As of July 8, 2026, ZCOM has returned 22.16% year to date, while ZSP has returned 13.34%. ZCOM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZCOM or ZSP?
As of July 8, 2026, ZCOM manages $588.12 M in assets, while ZSP manages $24.22 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZCOM and ZSP managed?
ZCOM is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZCOM or ZSP?
Year to date, ZCOM has seen +$10.04 M in net flows, compared with +$390.96 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZCOM and ZSP compare?
ZCOM has an expense ratio of 0.29%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about ZCOM and ZSP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.