ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page
VS
XUS
iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF

Full XUS fund page

Compare BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP) vs iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZSP and XUS provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, ZSP features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.08% for XUS. Performance-wise, ZSP has returned 11.41% year-to-date with +$413 M in net flows, whereas XUS is at 11.72% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Jun 30Jul 8Jul 15Jul 22Jul 29

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 30, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZSP
-2.03%+6.61%+11.41%+19.43%+77.63%
XUS
-1.70%+6.50%+11.72%+19.77%+78.17%
Flows
ZSP
-$106 M+$38 M+$413 M+$1,092 M+$5,278 M
XUS
+$177 M+$476 M+$1,286 M+$1,717 M+$3,457 M

ZSP vs XUS exposure

Countries

ZSP
USA
97.59%
XUS
USA
97.44%

Sectors

ZSP
Technology
45.24%
Finance
13.35%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.96%
Healthcare
8.87%
Industrials
7.90%
Other
15.69%
XUS
Technology
45.73%
Finance
13.14%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.76%
Healthcare
8.66%
Industrials
7.94%
Other
15.76%
As of July 30, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.48%
Microsoft Corp.
4.29%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.68%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.60%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.94%
Tesla, Inc.
1.81%
XUS
NVIDIA Corp.
7.50%
Apple, Inc.
6.58%
Microsoft Corp.
4.29%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.77%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.58%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.02%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%
Tesla, Inc.
1.83%

Diversification

ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.20%
XUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
36.34%

Characteristics

Compare
ZSP
XUS
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CADS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.78%1.14%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 14, 2012April 10, 2013

Frequently asked questions about ZSP and XUS

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZSP or XUS?
As of July 30, 2026, ZSP has returned 11.41% year to date, while XUS has returned 11.72%. XUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZSP or XUS?
As of July 30, 2026, ZSP manages $23.83 B in assets, while XUS manages $12.86 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZSP and XUS managed?
ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XUS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZSP and XUS emphasize?
ZSP is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. XUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZSP or XUS?
Year to date, ZSP has seen +$412.57 M in net flows, compared with +$1,285.91 M for XUS. XUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZSP and XUS compare?
ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while XUS has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of ZSP and XUS?
ZSP's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. XUS's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZSP or XUS?
ZSP holds 495 securities, while XUS holds 497. On holdings count, XUS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZSP and XUS

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds