Compare BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP) vs iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZSP and XUS provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, ZSP features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.08% for XUS. Performance-wise, ZSP has returned 15.35% year-to-date with +$1 B in net flows, whereas XUS is at 15.6% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZSP
XUS
| AuM | $25,340.41 M | $13,713.36 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.05% | -0.24% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 26, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZSP | -1.13% | +3.02% | +15.35% | +12.86% | +93.89% |
XUS | -1.00% | +3.13% | +15.60% | +12.95% | +94.24% | |
| Flows | ZSP | +$196 M | +$721 M | +$1,133 M | +$1,867 M | +$5,658 M |
XUS | +$177 M | +$421 M | +$1,694 M | +$2,610 M | +$4,148 M |
ZSP vs XUS exposure
Countries
ZSP
USA
97.65%
XUS
USA
97.51%
Sectors
ZSP
Technology
45.20%
Finance
13.72%
Healthcare
9.09%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.98%
Industrials
7.57%
Other
15.44%
XUS
Technology
45.18%
Finance
13.61%
Healthcare
9.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.87%
Industrials
7.45%
Other
15.82%
As of October 26, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.95%
Apple, Inc.
7.09%
Microsoft Corp.
5.75%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.06%
Broadcom Inc.
2.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.59%
Tesla, Inc.
1.48%
XUS
US4642872000
99.95%
Diversification
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
37.84%
XUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
99.95%
Characteristics
Compare
ZSP
XUS
| Provider | BMO | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.77% | 1.11% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 14, 2012 | April 10, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about ZSP and XUS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZSP or XUS?
As of October 26, 2026, ZSP has returned 15.35% year to date, while XUS has returned 15.60%. XUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZSP or XUS?
As of October 26, 2026, ZSP manages $25.34 B in assets, while XUS manages $13.71 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZSP and XUS managed?
ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XUS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZSP or XUS?
ZSP holds 499 securities, while XUS holds 1. On holdings count, ZSP is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZSP or XUS?
Year to date, ZSP has seen +$1,133.22 M in net flows, compared with +$1,694.42 M for XUS. XUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZSP and XUS compare?
ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while XUS has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What sectors do ZSP and XUS emphasize?
ZSP is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. XUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Recent articles about ZSP and XUS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.